Wwhich RFCs the new work would obsolete, vs update or leave alone

[Patrik Fältström]

On 20 mar 2008, at 11.07, Simon Josefsson wrote:

> Can you name one context where StringPrep would be considered part of
> IDNA2003?

Because you have normative references to StringPrep from IDNA2003 RFC.  
So to implement IDNA2003, you also implement StringPrep (the Nameprep  
profile of StringPrep).

    Patrik