Remove reference to 4690 from charter

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at
Wed Mar 19 22:16:22 CET 2008

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:23:32AM -0700,
 Lisa Dusseault <ldusseault at> wrote 
 a message of 65 lines which said:

> "RFC4690 informs this work, although the WG is not expected to solve
> all the problems and address all of the issues that RFC4690
> identifies."
> Stephane?

I disagree with this proposal, for the reasons well explained by Mark

(For instance, the RFC 4690 "identifies" pseudo-issues such as

More information about the Idna-update mailing list