Latest charter version and TODOs from BOF

Vint Cerf vint at
Mon Mar 17 22:21:54 CET 2008

Thanks paul - a simpler, more general charter seems advisable. There will be many details to resolve and little point in listiing a subset in the charter iit would seem. 


----- Original Message -----
From: idna-update-bounces at <idna-update-bounces at>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa at>; idna-update at <idna-update at>
Sent: Mon Mar 17 13:42:24 2008
Subject: Re: Latest charter version and TODOs from BOF

At 10:12 AM -0700 3/17/08, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>Additional goals:
>   - Separate requirements for valid IDNs at registration time,
>     vs. at resolution time
>???  - Revise bi-directional algorithms to produce a deterministic
>	answer whether a label is allowed or not
>???  - Determine whether bi-directional algorithm should allow
>	additional mnemonics labels
>   - Permit effective use of some scripts that were
>	inadvertently excluded by the original protocols.

Given the milestones discussion I just sent, I think we can eliminate 
this whole list. That is, these specific things from the design team 
(as compared to the dozens of other specific things from the design 
team) should not be called out in the charter.
Idna-update mailing list
Idna-update at

More information about the Idna-update mailing list