IDNA applications (was: RE: sharp s (Eszett))
phoffman at imc.org
Fri Mar 7 23:32:59 CET 2008
Following up on my own posting:
At 2:19 PM -0800 3/7/08, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>This goes back to a comment you made earlier today about the way I
>stated "(a)". I said:
>a) Update base character set from Unicode 3.2 to Unicode 5.0 or 5.1
>a) Update base character set from Unicode 3.2 to Unicode version-agnostic
>Those two are quite different statements, and the group needs to
>decide which, if either, it wants to achieve.
Looking at the proposed charter again, it says both (a) and (b).
>were tied to Unicode version 3.2 and an update to the current
>version (5.x) is required to accommodate additional scripts.
. . .
>is chartered to untie IDNA from specific versions of Unicode using
>algorithms that define validity based on Unicode properties.
We need to clear this up in the charter depending on how the group wants to go.
More information about the Idna-update