High-level changes from IDNA2003 in the "current work"
vint at google.com
Fri Mar 7 16:13:10 CET 2008
thanks - understand the rationale - the idea to associate documents
with reference to principles might be a useful guide but taking
Paul's point and yours, perhaps it is better for the charter to avoid
specifics of document organization.
On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:09 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
> --On Thursday, 06 March, 2008 18:18 -0500 Vint Cerf
> <vint at google.com> wrote:
>> that looks like a pretty good list. harald alvestrand, john
>> klensin and patrik faltstrom will likely have more precise
>> response. I wonder if it is worth summarizing "by document" ?
> I think not. Following Paul's lead in notes about the charter,
> I'd rather separate the principles of what we are doing from the
> details of document organization. Remember how recently
> "draft-klensin-idnabis-protocol" was split off from
> "draft-klensin-idnabis-issues" and the latter changed enough in
> content that the file name no longer really matches to content
> (or title, which has been changed a few times too). One might
> include references in the list to the document(s) in which the
> topic is addressed, but that isn't quite what I think you are
More information about the Idna-update