High-level changes from IDNA2003 in the "current work"

Vint Cerf vint at google.com
Fri Mar 7 16:13:10 CET 2008


thanks - understand the rationale - the idea to associate documents  
with reference to principles might be a useful guide but taking  
Paul's point and yours, perhaps it is better for the charter to avoid  
specifics of document organization.


On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:09 AM, John C Klensin wrote:

> --On Thursday, 06 March, 2008 18:18 -0500 Vint Cerf
> <vint at google.com> wrote:
>> that looks like a pretty good list. harald alvestrand, john
>> klensin and patrik faltstrom will likely have more precise
>> response.  I wonder if it is worth summarizing "by document" ?
> Vint,
> I think not.  Following Paul's lead in notes about the charter,
> I'd rather separate the principles of what we are doing from the
> details of document organization.   Remember how recently
> "draft-klensin-idnabis-protocol" was split off from
> "draft-klensin-idnabis-issues" and the latter changed enough in
> content that the file name no longer really matches to content
> (or title, which has been changed a few times too).   One might
> include references in the list to the document(s) in which the
> topic is addressed, but that isn't quite what I think you are
> suggesting.
>     john

More information about the Idna-update mailing list