3492bis

[Frank Ellermann]

Paul Hoffman wrote:
 
> Given that almost no one cares about Draft Standard
> vs. Proposed Standard

I wouldn't take that as given for something I don't
know, i.e. for a DS I'd trust that it's no nonsense.

> This seems more like bookkeeping.

There's a reported RFC 3492 erratum, and appendix D
of the I-D summarizes ten fixed / clarified points.
This could be relevant for implementors porting the
C sample code to other languages.  

 Frank