Comments on the Unicode Codepoints and IDNA Internet-Draft
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Tue Jul 29 09:24:30 CEST 2008
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:53:43AM +0100,
Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se> wrote
a message of 20 lines which said:
> Just remember that we not only talk about a clueless registry, but a
> clueless (or a clever) registrant that register 3rd (or 4th) level
I believe that the rationale-01 document uses the word "registry" for
them as well:
Consequently, any DNS zone administration is
described as a "registry", regardless of that actual administrative
arrangements or level in the tree.
[Which seems the right thing to do to me.]
> Question is, does registration of these characters that are PVALID in
> -02, but requested to be not so, create harm if registered and used?
No. Characters never harm. And are never "hostile" despite what
protocol-03 says. What will come next? Terrorist characters?
More information about the Idna-update