LDH-label terminology

Paul Hoffman phoffman at imc.org
Sun Jul 27 16:39:04 CEST 2008

At 2:26 PM +0200 7/27/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>Another minimum - there are only two I'm aware of - in play
>is 2*63( LDH ) beginning with a letter and not ending with
>a hyphen, the "top-label".  Because it begins with a letter
>this avoids all known potential issues with IPv4 notations.

I disagree that this is a needed definition for *this* WG. If some 
other group wants to deal with this, that is fine. It is an artifact 
of 1123 that is adds complexity but not clarity to our documents.

More information about the Idna-update mailing list