hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz at gmail.com
Thu Jul 17 09:05:01 CEST 2008
Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Does that create any problems?
Intuitively, anything that was okay in IDNA2003 should
stay okay even if it was later deprecated, unless there
is a clear IDNA200x reason to do something else.
If there is a PVALID character introduced after IDNA2003
and deprecated before IDNA200x you could eliminate it as
unnecessary trouble. But we don't need to worry about it
if this set is empty. Maybe a matter of timing, what is
next in queue, Unicode 5.2 or IDNA200x ?
More information about the Idna-update