IDN uses unicode because...
Sam Vilain
sam.vilain at catalyst.net.nz
Wed Jul 9 01:01:18 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Shawn Steele wrote:
1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
> This always struck me as being a roundabout dissing of Unicode for
> some unknown reason. How about:
>
> "IDNA uses the Unicode character repertoire because its widely
> adopted and one of the few globally recognized standards that
> encompass the needs of all users".
To pick nits, "all users" is contestable. The CJK screw-up (where for
the CJK range codepoints were arbitrarily assigned to units of meaning
rather than actual characters) springs to mind!
These sorts of things (and I've no idea how widespread they are, really,
I know only of that one for certain) are IMHO the (not so) unknown
reason Unicode gets dissed frequently...
- --
Sam Vilain, Chief Yak Shaver, Catalyst IT (NZ) Ltd.
phone: +64 4 499 2267 PGP ID: 0x66B25843
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkhz8b0ACgkQ/AZAiGayWEPTkACgw0yUi8gF6Z87/qO1oo66FFzD
7o8An0JWraoKDpgnzR2sS30noSGk5VNp
=VGqZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list