What to keep in the registry database (Was: Tonus (was: Re: Casefolding Sigma (was: Re: IDNAbis Preprocessing Draft))

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Fri Feb 1 10:41:11 CET 2008


On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:26:49PM +0100,
 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se> wrote 
 a message of 81 lines which said:

> because of that U+03C2 can not be stored in the core of a database
> for matchings.

A warning: the thread mentioned the terml "database" in two different
meanings, the DNS database (the zone file for those who use a RFC1035
text zone file) and the registry database. The second one is richer
and carries more information (and is not limited by the RFC).

For instance, while we do not have IDN in ".fr", we studied a possible
implementation and one of the decisions was to keep in the database
the *original* Unicode label, before nameprep, because nameprep is
lossy (it loses some information as the one mentioned above) and it
seemed to us safer to keep the original information, in case of, for
instance, disputes ("I registered straße, not strasse!")

So, when our greek colleague says that he registered names with a
final sigma, it does not mean he violated RFC 3490 and 3491.



More information about the Idna-update mailing list