comments on Definitions -05

Mark Davis mark at macchiato.com
Sun Dec 21 20:29:05 CET 2008


I agree; it is very helpful - thanks for adding it.

Mark


On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:37, John C Klensin <klensin at jck.com> wrote:

>
>
> --On Sunday, 21 December, 2008 08:46 -0800 Erik van der Poel
> <erikv at google.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com>
> > wrote:
> >> draft-ietf-idnabis-defs-05.txt
> >> section 2.3.1.6
> >> Figure 1 really helps me and is a great reference - I hope
> >> others find that to be true as well.
> >
> > It is a great diagram. But I don't understand how "abc--def"
> > can be considered an example of a broken IDN. It doesn't have
> > the two dashes in positions 3 and 4.
>
> Typo that proves I'm not good at either ASCII art or trying to
> proofread my own stuff of that nature.   Should have been
> "ab--cdef"; will be fixed in -06.
>
> Vint gets the credit for suggesting that a diagram would be
> helpful.
>
>    john
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20081221/59e03f43/attachment.htm 


More information about the Idna-update mailing list