Tables: BackwardCompatible Maintanence

[Erik van der Poel]

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Mark Davis <mark at macchiato.com> wrote:
> Now, I do think that the likelyhood of the X/Y case happening is quite
> small, and essentially zero with any frequently used characters.

Eszett is frequently used. Yet, someone made a mistake there. Can you
guarantee that we didn't make any mistakes with somewhat less
frequently used characters?

Or is the IETF community now saying that we will not make any future
changes to PVALID and DISALLOWED, no matter how loudly the affected
communities scream?

Erik