Protocol-08 (and status of Defs-04 and Rationale-06)
Eric Brunner-Williams
ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Wed Dec 10 14:14:06 CET 2008
That's a generous offer Harald and I accept.
Erik, could I trouble you for the C++ code you wrote?
Eric
Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
>> I'm concerned that the proposed rules are overly broad, if a label
>> can be 63 characters, and the claim is that no two of them can have
>> properties A and B, where one has property A and one has property B,
>> then is the proposed rule true for some positional possibilities, but
>> not all, or true for all.
>>
>> If all, then the rule is minimal. If only some, then it would be
>> nice, at least, to be able to describe, and algorithmically would be
>> really nice, the set(s) for which the rule is correct, and the set(s)
>> for which the rule is incorrect.
>>
>> I'm happy to continue this off-list, as my original, and similar
>> query about rule 4 didn't get to "what do we know and how do we know
>> it".
> Eric,
>
> if you want to look at my Perl code, you're welcome to it.
>
> Warning: It's not pretty.
>
> Harald
>
>
>
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list