Tables: BackwardCompatible Maintanence
Patrik Fältström
patrik at frobbit.se
Wed Dec 10 07:10:23 CET 2008
On 10 dec 2008, at 03.25, Erik van der Poel wrote:
> I believe the point is that *if* a relevant Unicode property changes,
> no matter how unlikely, then the IETF and other DNS stakeholders ought
> to get a chance to consider whether or not to make the consequent
> incompatible change to IDNA.
Thanks, this is my point. At least the _first_ time this happens. When
the RFC is updated because of this, the first time, THEN we can have
this discussion (again) and relax the rule and say that the update of
list G Backward Compatible is automatic.
Patrik
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list