Reserved general punctuation

[Paul Hoffman]

At 10:21 PM +0100 3/20/08, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>On 20 mar 2008, at 18.30, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>>At 10:20 AM -0700 3/20/08, Mark Davis wrote:
>>>No, I'm saying the reverse. The way the 05 logic is set up, the 
>>>table contains the lines I quoted:
>>>
>>>2064..2069  ; DISALLOWED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
>>>
>>>I think it should not; that is, that those *should* be:
>>>
>>>2064..2069  ; UNASSIGNED  # <reserved>..<reserved>
>>
>>Got it. Yes, that seems right.
>
>I just want people to know I have seen this.
>
>    Patrik

Unfortunately, it did not get reflected in your newest draft from 
earlier today, which says:

200E..2071  ; DISALLOWED  # LEFT-TO-RIGHT MARK..SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL

Maybe the algorithm needs further tweaking for this.