WG Review: Internationalized Domain Names in Applications
vint at google.com
Wed Apr 9 17:17:19 CEST 2008
i find myself in the second group at the present.
On Apr 9, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 5:15 PM -0400 4/8/08, Vint Cerf wrote:
>> It is believed that the first attempt in 2003 did not adequately
>> deal with several key issues including Unicode version-independence.
> IDNA2003 was not supposed to deal with version-independence. Just
> the opposite: we explicitly chose to be version-dependent. Some of
> us think that was still the correct thing to do. Some of us also
> think that version-independence would be fine.
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update