[Idna-arabicscript] Re: 06FD and 06FE should be PVALID for Sindhi

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Wed Apr 2 14:14:57 CEST 2008

At 20:13 -0400 2008-04-01, John C Klensin wrote:

>>This leads to an interesting question about maintenance of the
>>exception tables for IDN200X - it sounds like something that
>>should end up as an IANA-maintained table. Does that sound
>I think that has been our general assumption.   As usual with 
>IANA-maintained tables these days, the key issue is not who 
>maintains the table but how the decisions to add or alter entries 
>are made.

If changing a particular entity from "So" to "Lo" would add it to the 
PVALID table then it would be no different from adding a brand new 
"Lo" character. But you might be in more trouble if an existing 
permitted letter were changed so that it suddenly was not valid.
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

More information about the Idna-update mailing list