New version, draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
patrik at frobbit.se
Wed Jun 20 08:45:21 CEST 2007
On 20 jun 2007, at 00.46, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
> Appropriate for inclusion.
To make my (as editor of the document) life easier, when going
through codepoint examples, can people (not only you Ken, do not take
this personally please) use terminology that maps directly to the
For example, I presume you with "Appropriate for inclusion" imply
that it is Appropriate with property value ALWAYS"?
And when you say "All of the CJK and Kangxi radicals are
inappropriate for IDN's
because of their general category gc=So." you say "it is ok for all
CJK and Kangxi radicals to be in NEVER as they do not match rule A
I.e. I need to understand when you find bugs in the rule set, and
when you prove the rules are correct. And I appreciate all help in
doing that matching while you discuss.
More information about the Idna-update