New version, draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available

[Patrik Fältström]

On 19 jun 2007, at 14.04, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> You are not willing to speak for the following ranges also in the  
> script "Han":
>
> 2E80..2E99    ; Han # So  [26] CJK RADICAL REPEAT..CJK RADICAL RAP
> 2E9B..2EF3    ; Han # So  [89] CJK RADICAL CHOKE..CJK RADICAL C- 
> SIMPLIFIED TURTLE
> 2F00..2FD5    ; Han # So [214] KANGXI RADICAL ONE..KANGXI RADICAL  
> FLUTE
> 3005          ; Han # Lm       IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
> 3007          ; Han # Nl       IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO
> 3021..3029    ; Han # Nl   [9] HANGZHOU NUMERAL ONE..HANGZHOU  
> NUMERAL NINE
> 3038..303A    ; Han # Nl   [3] HANGZHOU NUMERAL TEN..HANGZHOU  
> NUMERAL THIRTY
> 303B          ; Han # Lm       VERTICAL IDEOGRAPHIC ITERATION MARK
> 3400..4DB5    ; Han # Lo [6582] CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-3400..CJK  
> UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-4DB5
> F900..FA2D    ; Han # Lo [302] CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH- 
> F900..CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA2D
> FA30..FA6A    ; Han # Lo  [59] CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH- 
> FA30..CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FA6A
> FA70..FAD9    ; Han # Lo [106] CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH- 
> FA70..CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-FAD9
> 20000..2A6D6  ; Han # Lo [42711] CJK UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-20000..CJK  
> UNIFIED IDEOGRAPH-2A6D6
> 2F800..2FA1D  ; Han # Lo [542] CJK COMPATIBILITY  
> IDEOGRAPH-2F800..CJK COMPATIBILITY IDEOGRAPH-2FA1D
>
> (some of these may be eliminated by other rules in the current draft.)
> Correct?

Sure, some codepoints might be in "MAYBE NOT", but that is fine. The  
question is whether IF the codepoints in Han instead of MAYBE YES and  
MAYBE NOT get ALWAYS and NEVER, will we end up having (more) trouble  
with future versions of Unicode?

    Patrik