New version, draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
Debbie Garside
debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Tue Jun 19 13:14:50 CEST 2007
Hi Vint
Thanks. I'm reading the rules now. It may take me a while :-)
Best regards
Debbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vint Cerf [mailto:vint at google.com]
> Sent: 19 June 2007 11:45
> To: 'Debbie Garside'; patrik at frobbit.se; 'Martin Duerst'
> Cc: 'Harald Alvestrand'; 'Gervase Markham'; idna-update at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: New version,
> draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
>
> Debbie,
>
> By inference from Patrik's email, these would be scripts that
> have characters whose properties have placed them in the
> ALWAYS category which have an extremely low to zero
> probability of being moved later into the NEVER category.
>
> Vint
>
>
>
> Vinton G Cerf
> Chief Internet Evangelist
> Google
> Regus Suite 384
> 13800 Coppermine Road
> Herndon, VA 20171
>
> +1 703 234-1823
> +1 703-234-5822 (f)
>
> vint at google.com
> www.google.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Debbie Garside
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:17 AM
> To: patrik at frobbit.se; 'Martin Duerst'
> Cc: 'Harald Alvestrand'; 'Gervase Markham'; idna-update at alvestrand.no
> Subject: RE: New version,
> draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
>
> Patrik wrote:
>
> > Now give me names of other scripts that are as stable.
>
> Can you define stable please?
>
> Best regards
>
> Debbie
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no
> > [mailto:idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Patrik
> > Fältström
> > Sent: 19 June 2007 08:48
> > To: Martin Duerst
> > Cc: Harald Alvestrand; Gervase Markham; idna-update at alvestrand.no
> > Subject: Re: New version,
> > draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
> >
> >
> > On 19 jun 2007, at 04.45, Martin Duerst wrote:
> >
> > > So you want somebody to say that there will be no more bugs
> > in script
> > > X, and then you can add script X to the list? And you
> want to base
> > > this on past number of bugs? Which way? If a lot of bugs
> have been
> > > found, that may be an indication that there are not too many more
> > > left. Or, if a lot of bugs have been found, that may be an
> > indication
> > > of more benig hidden.
> >
> > I want someone to say what scripts they want there. I have together
> > with some people added Greek, Latin and Cyrillic. I have so far not
> > heard any other suggestions.
> >
> > I think Harald (specifically, he even came up with a suggested use
> > policy) and also John and also me, in different words, said
> that what
> > we (all of us, including you) do NOT want to happen is that
> something
> > that have ALWAYS end up getting the NEVER derived value. Or
> at least
> > minimize that risk. Moving things from ALWAYS to NEVER will
> definitely
> > create a situation where already registered domain names
> are no longer
> > valid. Etc etc.
> >
> > Of course it MIGHT happen. Also with latin, greek and
> cyrillic. But I
> > personally see that risk very very very very small. Enough to have
> > latin, greek and cyrillic there.
> >
> > Now give me names of other scripts that are as stable.
> >
> > Patrik
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Idna-update mailing list
> > Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
>
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list