New version, draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available
patrik at frobbit.se
Tue Jun 19 09:47:49 CEST 2007
On 19 jun 2007, at 04.45, Martin Duerst wrote:
> So you want somebody to say that there will be no more bugs in
> script X, and then you can add script X to the list? And you want
> to base this on past number of bugs? Which way? If a lot of bugs
> have been found, that may be an indication that there are not
> too many more left. Or, if a lot of bugs have been found, that
> may be an indication of more benig hidden.
I want someone to say what scripts they want there. I have together
with some people added Greek, Latin and Cyrillic. I have so far not
heard any other suggestions.
I think Harald (specifically, he even came up with a suggested use
policy) and also John and also me, in different words, said that what
we (all of us, including you) do NOT want to happen is that something
that have ALWAYS end up getting the NEVER derived value. Or at least
minimize that risk. Moving things from ALWAYS to NEVER will
definitely create a situation where already registered domain names
are no longer valid. Etc etc.
Of course it MIGHT happen. Also with latin, greek and cyrillic. But I
personally see that risk very very very very small. Enough to have
latin, greek and cyrillic there.
Now give me names of other scripts that are as stable.
More information about the Idna-update