idna folding (was Re: idna-bis and '?')
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Mon Dec 17 00:09:37 CET 2007
--On 16. desember 2007 15:07 -0800 Erik van der Poel <erikv at google.com>
> To me, this sounds as though one should not be mapped to the other at
> registration time, so I don't understand why people would be
> interested in treating them as the same codepoint at registration
We must take care with terms here.... I believe both Torbjørn and
Torbjörn would be interested in a regime where registering "torbjørn.se"
would not be allowed if "torbjörn.se" was already registered by someone
else. But that's bundling, not mapping. And the "default member" of the
bundle (the one that actually goes into the zonefile) would be different in
Norway and Sweden.
(btw, .no doesn't support bundling at this time. I don't believe .se does
More information about the Idna-update