Standards and localization (was Dot-mapping)

John C Klensin klensin at
Sat Dec 15 01:59:10 CET 2007

--On Thursday, 13 December, 2007 11:05 +0900 Yangwoo Ko
<newcat at> wrote:

>> I don't know what is in "and so forth", but I imagine that
>> other cases will be discovered.  
> Simplified <-> Traditional Chinese character
> equivalence/mapping (as exemplified in RFC3743) could be one
> of those "and so forth".

If that mapping were unique and one-to-one, certainly yes.
Since it is not, the registry-side solution of RFC 3743 may
remain the best that can be done.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list