IDNAbis discussion style, mappings, and (incidentally)Eszett

[Thomas Roessler]

On 2007-12-06 20:17:04 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:

>>(4) Finally, please try to assume that we are acting in good
>>faith (even if, at some level, you don't believe it).  We are
>>much more likely to be able to respond in a useful way and to
>>participate in a dialog if we aren't first accused of having
>>some bizarre agenda.

> Frankly, I couldn't immagine you having any other agenda than
> making things better.

+1 to that, incidentally.  I'm not sure what the bizarre agenda /
conspiracy topic is doing in this particular thread, at all.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler   <roessler at does-not-exist.org>