Table issues (Part 2)

Patrik Fältström patrik at
Wed Dec 5 18:16:59 CET 2007

On 4 dec 2007, at 22.17, Mark Davis wrote:

> By doing this, we'd guarantee
> that all characters that were {IDN=Always} in a previous version are
> {IDN=Always} in the current version;

But the change of one of the properties that you might change happens  
because of a reason (error in the definition, new findings etc). This  
imply that the derived property over time will diverge from the real  
derived property over time. Right?

I.e. {derived-property-according-to-5.1} might be a superset of  
{derived-property-according-to-5.2}, i.e. if you do the calculations  
on 5.1 you get a larger set than if you do the calculations on 5.2?


More information about the Idna-update mailing list