The lookalike problem(s)
phoffman at imc.org
Sun Nov 26 22:00:23 CET 2006
At 2:45 PM -0500 11/26/06, John C Klensin wrote:
>(1) I don't see any way to put a "one label, one script" rule
>into the protocol in a way that would do us any good.
That's good to hear; we are in agreement then.
>But, Michael, this is, I believe, why you and Paul have been
>confusing each other. I think that he assumed, when we have
>said "one label, one script", that the test would be made on
>"Greek script" only. The fact that the European digits aren't
>"Latin script" is irrelevant -- from the standpoint of that test
>as he (reasonably) interpreted it, it is important only that
>they aren't Greek.
Right, sorry. The example would be the same for
"<name-of-Greek-company>-USA.gr". We are not going to include all of
"Common" either, of course.
>(3) While I am getting skeptical about the feasibility of
>applying a label-homogeneity rules to the basic protocol, these
>sorts of things makes perfectly good sense as a registry
They can make good sense, but also can be unnecessarily onerous. I
believe we should not be encouraging such rules, simply saying that
they are reasonable in some cases, From the past few years of
experience, I would say ccTLDs are better off picking-and-choosing
which characters outside their natural script they would allow in
their SLD names.
More information about the Idna-update