UTC Agenda Item: IDNA proposal
patrik at frobbit.se
Fri Nov 24 04:48:12 CET 2006
On 24 nov 2006, at 02.43, John C Klensin wrote:
> --On Friday, 24 November, 2006 09:30 +1300 Sam Vilain
> <sam.vilain at catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
>> Fair points. How about, for characters that have not had the
>> script-aware decision made on them, get categorised as
>> "Pending" rather than "Exclude" ? Then it is fairly obvious
>> that the decision making process is incomplete.
> That was where we started. I assume that, in many cases, the
> assignment of "Exclude" is a temporary consequence of the
> software and templates Patrik is using, rather than an
> intentional or permanent choice.
That is actually what I have internally in the software, a
classification of score 1-4 for the different classes (and a fifth
class for class Lu and Lt). Then between the versions I "just" move
classes between the scoring mechanism, plus adding special cases of
That scoring is not visible in these tables though, as people asked
for more black/white result.
More information about the Idna-update