FW: [centr-tech] IDNA Redux]

Marcos Sanz/Denic sanz at denic.de
Mon Nov 6 23:15:13 CET 2006


> To avoid serious confusables problems that we already know have been or 
> be exploited, we many need to yield to unique "identifier" requirements 
> if this means the allowed character set does not permit precise 
> oriented" expression. 

I agree. However the rationale in draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables about 
which characters are allowed to be an identifier or not is not very clear 
to my eyes. What about taking UAX #31 as a starting point and then 
refining on that, if need be?

Best regards

More information about the Idna-update mailing list