Moving Right Along on the Inclusions Table...

[Kenneth Whistler]

Mark suggested:

>    - We should also add the Joiner/NonJoiner. They would however, as
>    discussed, be restricted to very specific contexts by additional clauses
>    (like the current bidi restrictions).
>    - I think those are the only ones from
>    http://unicode.org/reports/tr31/#Specific_Character_Adjustments that
>    we need to consider, but others may have more information.

O.k. I've updated:

http://www.unicode.org/~whistler/SPInclusionAdd061219.txt

with ZERO WIDTH JOINER and ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER, so we can keep
track of this suggestion.

--Ken