Leaving out scripts (Re: Unicode versions (Re: Criteria for
exceptional characters))
Michael Everson
everson at evertype.com
Wed Dec 20 01:05:03 CET 2006
At 00:57 +0100 2006-12-20, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>Until we have a decision and an algorithm that
>we are sure makes sense for the use of Arabic
>modified forms, Arabic vowel marks and Arabic
>shaping modifiers, I think it makes more sense
>not to register any Arabic domain names.
Please contact Roozbeh Pournader about this. This
has been dealt with quite well by our Iranian
colleagues.
>Until we have a decision and an algorithm for
>determining when ZWJ/ZWNJ should be allowed in
>Sanskrit domain names, I think it makes more
>sense not to register any Sanskrit domain names.
This does need to be sorted out.
>Until we have a rule that allows us to use the
>vowel marks in Dhivehi without causing damage to
>any other part of the registration set, I think
>it makes more sense not to register any Dhivehi
>domain names.
What earthly DAMAGE could Dhivehi vowel marks do
to any other part of the Registration set? If you
ban script-mixing, then Dhivehi vowel marks can
ONLY be used following Dhivehi letters (where
they are obligatory). Nothing can possibly be
harmed by them in that context. If you allow
script-mixing, then of course, someone might try
to spoof Danish å by using a THAANA SUKUN.
So don't allow it.
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list