Document:   draft-santesson-tls-supp-00.txt
Reviewer: Tom Taylor
Review Date:  Tuesday 4/11/2006 4:20 PM CST
IESG Telechat Date:  Thursday, 13 April 2006

Summary:  This document is ready for Proposed Standard. I found one nit:

In the second sentence of section 7 IANA Considerations, the term "TLS 
Authorization Data Format identifiers" is used. I believe that should be 
"TLS Supplemental Data Format identifiers".

I note that RFC 2119 capitalization was used for protocol requirements, 
but requirements on other documents defining specific extensions used 
small letter "must". I would be interested to learn if this is accepted 
policy, since I have charge of an I-D that is defining requirements on 
other documents.

[Appended to review on Wednesday 4/12/2006 8:18 AM CST]

In section 2, the enum adding supplemental_data as a HandshakeType has 
"TBD" for the value. I don't see an IANA registry for these values, so I 
assume this has to be filled in at some point.

Looking at draft-ietf-tls-rfc2246-bis-13.txt and comparing the 
currently-assigned values to the order in which the messages occur in 
the protocol, I conclude that the applicable value should lie between 3 
and 10.