Draft: draft-kompella-ccc-02.txt Reviewer: Michael A. Patton [MAP@MAP-NE.com] Date: Wednesday 6/22/2005 1:12 AM CST Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC Review: One minor suggestion: This describes a particular implementation on one vendor's equipment, right? I'd actually like to see that mentioned in either the Abstract or Introduction, or both. It's not really an important point, but it would make some of the discussion a little clearer, especially when you get to Section 3 and the examples of configuration. I also found it a bit weird that an Informational document should have exactly one Normative Reference. Wouldn't it be more natural to just have informative references? However, if you actually are splitting them, it seems to me that some of the references you list as Informative really are as Normative as the one you listed. Typos ----- Section 3. "a AC" => "an AC" Section 4.1: "just as in in CCC" => "just as in CCC" Section 4.1: "could be be obtained" => "could be obtained"