Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scenarios-analysis-02
Reviewer: Mark Allman
Date: May 26, 2004

This document is mostly fine to publish as an informational RFC.

  + It could really use a pass to get rid of alot of "this", "these" and
    "its".  In some places it is very confusing what the author is
    actually referring to.

  + More references to various bits of the technology would be nice
    (e.g., to Teredo (among others); although maybe I just missed this
    one).

  + Some statements could be shored up a bit.  E.g., on page 10 it is
    noted that "RIPng is not appropriate in most contexts".  It'd be
    nice if there was a small bit of explanation or a reference here.

The document doesn't hurt.  I am not sure how much I thought it would
help -- everything seems pretty straightforward.  And, it is not clear
that this is really an "experience" piece.  That said, there is some
decent stuff in here, too.