Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udplite-mib-01.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@nsn.com> 
Review Date: 2007-09-24 
IETF LC End Date: 2007-09-26

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.

Comments: The document is well written and fortunately contains numerous pointers to the baseline UDP MIB specification.

I have a comment with respect the normative statements that appear in towards the end of Section 4, using the terms "RECOMMENDED" and "NOT RECOMMENDED". The text I refer to is this one:

    Further, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT
    RECOMMENDED.  Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to
    enable cryptographic security.

I think the text is speaking about *deployment*, not about
*implementation* of a feature. RFC 2119 only considers implementation, but not deployment issues, so in my opinion the upper case should not apply. Additionally, please notice that RFC 2119 does not define the term "NOT RECOMMENDED", so, it certainly has little meaning in uppercase.