Document:   draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-16.txt
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern [joel@stevecrocker.com]
Review Date:  Tuesday 12/13/2005 4:25 PM CST
Telechat Date:  Thursday 12/15/2005

Summary: This document is presumably ready for publication as whatever status the 
IESG thinks it should have.

Frankly, given that this document is a list of changes to a document I am 
not familiar with, my reading was a surface review to see if anything leapt 
out at me.  I presume that there is a good reason why the tsvwg or SCTPwg 
did not revise 2960 instead of issuing 100 pages of errata.  I personally 
find documents like this almost useless, even when I know the space.

I confess that having found the writeup, and read Allison / James comments, 
I am left with the distinct impression that this is a Proposed 
Standard.  As far as I can tell, the import of this document is that folks 
should take apply these changes when implementing RFC 2960.  The document 
says "this is a compilation of all defects".  Pretending this is 
"informational" seems a bad idea.