Draft:  draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-alternates-01.txt
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins [spencer@mcsr-labs.org]
Review Date: Wednesday 8/9/2006 5:45 PM CST
IETF LC Date: 8/14/2006

Summary: this draft is almost ready for publication. I have some very minor 
comments that I'm sending along. Please look at these comments along with 
any other Last Call comments you may receive.

I have no editorial nits for this draft - thanks! It was clean and easy 
to understand...

-----------

- this draft is targeted as a BCP - just seems strange, because it's a lot 
more like a requirements document. If everyone else is OK with this, I'm ok 
(just confused about why considerations for additional work on ECN would be 
a BCP).

- In Figure 1, I THINK the "Old Router" is actually an "Old Router 
Experiencing Congestion" - is this correct? If so, labeling the router as 
"experiencing congestion" would have helped me - at first glance, the figure 
seems to say "old routers drop non-ECN traffic", but what I think is 
actually meant is "old routers drop non-ECN traffic when they encounter 
congestion because there is no other choice".