Document: draft-ietf-sip-smime-aes-01.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Date: April 14, 2004 If the Security area is happy, I would vote no-ob. This just seems to be a senisble piece of clean-up. > Question for IESG: can a > document like this be BCP? It would avoid later dependency This is a good illustration of why the 3 step standards process is pointless, but IMHO this needs to be PS, logically.