Draft: draft-ietf-sip-answermode-04.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan [suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com] Review Date: 8/4/2007 IETF LC Date: 8/5/2007 Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication, but I have a minor issue that needs to be resolved. Minor ===== * Section 4 The following text does not look right. I think the client and server roles have been reversed. The current text looks like this " Each value of the Answer-Mode or Priv-Answer-Mode header field can include an optional parameter, "require". If present, this parameter indicates that the UAS would prefer that the UAC reject the request if the UAC is unwilling (perhaps due to policy) to answer in the mode requested, rather than answering in another mode. " I think each instance of UAC must be replaced with UAS, and UAS must be replaced with UAC.