Document: draft-ietf-simple-future-04.txt Reviewer: Avri Doria Date: 28 November 2005 Telechat Date: 1 December 2005 Overview: no objections with comments/questions - As a naive reviewer, I do not know what 'presentity' means. This should probably be defined. - Needs spell check: e.g thes - RFC 2119 issues: In 3. Implementations SHOULD ascertain whether the time values in the elements are plausible, for example, by checking whether the time stamp in a notification protocol message corresponds to local time and by making sure that they are fully in the past or future, both relative to real time and the time contained in the optional PIDF element. In which cases or under what conditions is doing this not required? Question: Has all the XML been verified?