Draft:  draft-ietf-pwe3-control-protocol-17.txt
Reviewer: Spencer Dawkins [spencer@mcsr-labs.org]
Review Date: Monday 7/18/2005 11:07 AM CST
Telechat Date: 21 July 2005

Summary: Ready with nits

Review Comments: This document is very close to being ready for publication 
as Proposed Standard, with some very minor nits that the RFC Editor 
can easily correct before AUTH48.

The revisions resulting from Thomas Narten's AD review seem reasonable 
and helpful.

The rationale may not belong in THIS document, but after looking at 
both this document and RFC 3985, I'm still not entirely sure why PW 
isn't MPLS. Maybe something short and Informational?

One question on page 22 - in this sentence,

 As mentioned above, as MPLS enabled network, should not accept MPLS
 packets from its external interfaces (i.e. interfaces to CE devices
 or to other providers' networks) unless the top label of the packet
 was legitimately distributed to the system from which the packet is
 being received.

Should "should not" be SHOULD NOT? (nd is there a reasonable 
justification for accepting them)?