Document: draft-ietf-pkix-rsa-pkalgs-03.txt
Reviewer: John Loughney
Date: April 14, 2004

I read the document twice.  The text is fairly dense, but I think I got
the point.  I couldn't find any technical issues with the document, but
I have one open question, and some things which fall into the nit 
category.

John


OPEN QUESTION:

1) Section 1 states: 

	This document supplements RFC 3279 [PKALGS].  

   Question - is this an 'official' thing - for example, documents can
   obsolete other documents?  Does the document need to be a bit more
   explicit on how it supplements the existing RFC?

NITS:

1) Acronyms in abstract -  RSASSA-PSS, RSAES-OAEP, PKCS #1 version 1.5 - 
   these should be expanded.
2) Authors' affiliation should be listed on a seperate line.
3) TOC formatting is off.
4) Need blank line before the footer text on the first page.
5) Missing IPR text.