Document: draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-02.txt
Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@nsn.com>	
Review Date: 2008-03-25
IETF LC End Date: 2008-03-26

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a proposed standard RFC.

Comments:

- Section 2.2. The document mentions an expired Internet-Draft without a reference. Since this is not critical for the document, and since this document is going to be published as an RFC, I would suggest to delete the draft name, perhaps even the second complete sentence.

- Section 3, 7th paragraph says:

                                                                 The
    receiver must always store a valid received Opaque LSA in its link-
    state database.  The receiver must not accept Opaque LSAs that
    violate the flooding scope (e.g., a type-11 (domain-wide) Opaque LSA

I think the "must" and "must not" should be normative (capitalized).

- References [OSPF-MT] and [OSPFv3] do not list the version number of the draft. Actually, OSPF-MT has been published as RFC 4915.