Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-nfsdirect-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 2007-10-10
IETF LC End Date: 2007-10-12
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Almost ready

Comments: I maintain my concern about the abbrevs in the Abstract even I recognize it is more from the way the nfsv4 stuff is cut out in several documents...
There are some places where the wording is not so good (the RFC editor should fix them):
 - 5 page 6: "buffers, lest an RDMA"
 - 5 page 7: unbounded -> unbound
 - 7 page 7: are required by that: thhat -> this and BTW what is the
   specification, RFC 3530?
 - 7 page 8: the two "by IANA".