Document: draft-ietf-mip4-radius-requirements-03.txt Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 15 Jun 2007 IESG Telechat date: 21 Jun 2007 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational. Three nits: 1) Section 1: s/[RFC3957] all based/[RFC3957], all based (The comma improves readibility) 2) Section 3: s/reqiuired/required 3) Section 3.1: In the first and third bullet item, it appears appropriate that the word "required" be upper-cased to denote its use as a normative declaration. More so since bullet item two contains the word "MUST" in normative fashion. I believe that the authors are making a normative set of declarations for the goals, so it appears uneven to have a MUST in the second bullet item and not a pair of REQUIREDs in the other two bullets.