Draft: draft-ietf-mboned-msdp-deploy-06.txt
Reviewer: Scott W Brim
Date: July 6, 2004

I will go with "no objection" on this one.  There are a couple tiny
things that RFC Editor can clean up, and a couple issues on text
clarity, but nothing I can object to.  The "clarity" issues are just as
much my problem as the draft's.  This is deployment scenarios, not a
protocol spec, and if you have enough understanding of the protocol to
want to deploy it, you will very probably have no problems with text
clarity.  

- Idnits says it's a little off on rfc2026/3667/3668 conformance.  

- I'm wholeheartedly in favor of the Normative Reference variance for
  MSDP, and leaving MSDP experimental.