Document:   draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-09
Reviewer: Ron Bonica [rbonica@juniper.net]
Review Date:  Tuesday 4/25/2006 2:35 PM CST
IESG Telechat Date:  Thursday, 27 April 2006

Summary: The document is well written and generally ready for publication. 

I understood it even though I am not a VOIP guy. The following are very
small comments:

- In Section 5, are you sure that you want to refer to the two database
access as "first" and "second"? Would words like "originating network"
and "serving network" be more descriptive? (This is a question, not a
comment?)

- In Section 5.1, you talk about "cic" and "rn" information that is "not
useful". A few paragraphs later, you talk about what to do if the "cic"
represents the local network or the "rn" represents the local node. I
assume that this is what you mean by "not useful". If so, would the word
 "local" be more descriptive than "not useful"? (Again, just a question).