Draft: draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-auth-ecdsa-05.txt Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo Review Date: 21 April 2006 IETF LC Date: 5 April 2006 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as a PS RFC, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Additionally, this draft does not seem to contain any normative language. If the policy for adding entries to the IANA registry this draft updates does not require the publication of a PS RFC (I have not checked that point), this RFC could be Informational instead. Comments: The boilerplates should be updated to be compliant with current IETF policies. Acronyms in the title of the draft should be expanded. In section 3, the draft says: The document defines the following... the phrase would be clearer if it said instead: *This* document defines... The second paragraph of page 4 refers the IANA registry by giving a pointer to a reference ([IANA]). The reference [IANA] points to the registry using its URI. IANA registries should not be referenced by their URIs; they should be referenced by their names. In this case, "The IANA Registry for IPSEC Authentication Methods". This should be changed in both Sections 3 and 5. The Security Considerations and IANA Considerations Sections are typically the last sections before the References and the Authors' Addresses. This draft has a section (Section 6) after the IANA Considerations section. I suggest that that section is converted into an appendix or moved before the Security Considerations Section.