Document: draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3-10.txt
Review: Scott W Brim 
Date: 26 mars 2005 

I only reviewed the changes.  I assume that Brian did a good job last
time :-)

No objection.  

The differences between 09 and 10 are clarification of interactions
between anti-replay and manual key mgmt, an interesting section on
backward compatibility (in almost all cases if a receiver doesn't
understand a feature, things just work anyway), and a bit more on
recovering from "significant" packet loss.  Brian might like to read
the backward compatibility section since that was a major concern of
his -- it looks okay to me.  

The section on significant packet loss reflects a fundamental
principle.  Acknowledging that things do go wrong occasionally despite
all efforts, and building in a really good response to that instead of
fighting it heroically to the last detail, increases resilience and
survivability and removes brittleness.  In recent discussions I've
become a strong advocate for this kind of "sloppiness".