Document: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-analysis-05
Reviewer: Lucy Lynch
Date: July 22, 2004

OK as Informational

Major differences from draft-ietf-idr-bgp-analysis-04.txt
include a reorganization of the final sections (ip etc.)
and some tightening up of language in most sections as
well as a few replacements of BGP w/BGP-4 per WG feedback.

NITS -

idnits-v1.31 draft-ietf-idr-bgp-analysis-05.txt
idnits 1.31 (30 May 2004)

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-analysis-05.txt:


  * The document claims conformance with section 10 of RFC 2026, but uses
    some RFC 3667/3668 boilerplate.  As RFC 3667/3668 replaces section 10
    of RFC 2026, you should not claim conformance with it if you have
    changed to using RFC 3667/3668 boilerplate.

  Checking conformance with RFC 2026 boilerplate...
  The document seems to lack an 2026 Section 10.4(C) Copyright Notice
  -- however, there's a paragraph with a matching beginning. Boilerplate
   error?
  There are 10 instances of too long lines in the document,
  -- the longest one being 8 characters in excess of 72.

  Warnings:
    The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(A) Disclaimer
    The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(B) IPR Disclosure
    Invitation
    There are 6 instances of lines with hyphenated line breaks in the
    document.

    Line 376 has weird spacing: '...etworks  Mean ...'
    Line 445 has weird spacing: '... AS4 is  a mul...'